<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>01614nam a2200205Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">CTU_106939</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210402s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">658.4</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="b">S898</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Strategic vs. evolutionary management :</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="2">
   <subfield code="b">A U.S.-Japan comparison of strategy and organization</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="c">Tadao Kagono ... [et al.] ; in collaboration with Shiori Sakamoto, Johny K. Johansson</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Amsterdam ; New York</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="b">North-Holland</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="c">1985</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">In this book the strengths and weaknesses of typical U.S. and Japanese companies are identified and two different models of organizational adaptations (rational-strategic and organic-evolutionary) are proposed on the basis of a quantitative comparison of the largest 1,000 firms both in the U.S. and Japan. Strategies, organizational structures and management processes of large corporations in the U.S. and Japan are compared. An intensive longitudinal analysis of 36 large firms within the sample found both (a) consistent differences in strategy, organizational structure, and management process among the sample companies in general and (b) remarkable commonalities among high-performing companies in the two countries. An evolutionary model, which is drawn out from typical Japanese companies, is applicable to high performers in both countries with certain modifications.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Industrial management,Industrial management,Strategic planning,Strategic planning</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="z">United states,Japan,United states,Japan</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="904" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="i">M.Loan</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Cần Thơ</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
