<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>01435nam a2200241Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">CTU_166505</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210402s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="c">93</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">337.51</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="b">M824</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Moore, Thomas Geoffrey</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">China in the world market :</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="b">Chinese industry and international sources of reform in the post-Mao era</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="c">Thomas G. Moore</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Cambridge, U.K.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="c">2002</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Moore presents detailed case studies of textiles and shipbuilding to examine the impact of varying degrees of economic openness in the world trading system on the reform, restructuring, and rationalization of Chinese industries. As the book amply demonstrates, the international environment most propitious for change in China's textile and shipbuilding industries during the 1980s and 1990s was one marked by moderate economic closure rather then the ideal-typic economic openness assumed by most observers. Moore also challenges popular notions of China's recent economic success by arguing that Beijing's ability to pursue strategic industrial policy is actually quite limited.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Industries,Economic history,Công nghiệp,Lịch sử kinh tế</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="y">1945-,1945-</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="z">China,Trung Quốc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="904" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="i">Đình Thư, Giang</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Cần Thơ</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
