<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>01605nam a2200229Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">CTU_166733</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210402s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="c">92.39</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">519.542</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="b">H861</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Howie, David</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">Interpreting probability :</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="b">Controversies and developments in the early twentieth century</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="c">David Howie</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="c">2002</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">This book is a study of the concept of probability as it has been used and applied across a number of scientific disciplines from genetics to geophysics. Probability has a dual aspect: sometimes it is a numerical ratio; sometimes, in the Bayesian interpretation, a degree of belief. David Howie examines probabilistic theories of scientific knowledge, and asks how, despite being adopted by many scientists and statisticians in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Bayesianism was discredited as a theory of scientific inference during the 1920s and 1930s. Through a close examination of a dispute between two British scientists, the author argues that a choice between the two interpretations of probability is not forced by pure logic, or the mathematics of the situation, but depends on the experiences and aims of the individuals involved, and their views of the correct form of scientific inquiry.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Probabilities,Bayesian statistical decision theory</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="y">Xác suất,Lý thuyết thống kê</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="904" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="i">Trọng Hiếu</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Cần Thơ</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
