<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
 <record>
  <leader>02313nam a2200217Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">CTU_227691</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210402s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">338.0951</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="b">A552</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Andors, Stephen</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="a">China's industrial revolution :</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="b">Politics, planning, and management, 1949 to the present</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2="0">
   <subfield code="c">Stephen Andors</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">New York</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="b">Pantheon Books</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="c">1977</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Framed by the premise that Maoist China essentially solved the problems of &quot;bureaucracy&quot; and &quot;centralization,&quot; this is a particularized, enthusiastic account of state planning policies and plant management methods as they evolved away from the Soviet models of the 1950s. The 1966-67 Great Leap Forward is viewed as the first breakthrough in &quot;putting politics in command&quot; of technique, with its challenge to the monetary incentive system of labor relations and its replacement of one-man factory management with collective forms. For Andors, the Cultural Revolution represents the high point in this process, with Maoists overturning the &quot;Seventy Articles&quot; regulations on managerial duties. Among the upheavals were the Kiangsi Motor Vehicle Plant workers' shocked discovery that their manager relied on foreign models and imported equipment; attacks on the &quot;elitist&quot; attitudes of the experts running the 555 Clock Factory in Shanghai; and the revelation that the head technician at the Suchow Monosodium Glutamate Factory was a former landlord. Despite an abundance of such details, Andors shows little interest in the economic results of organizational shakeups; he does not justify industrial disruptions during the Cultural Revolution, but ignores them. Originally a doctoral dissertation, this entry in the Asia Library Series does not include enough material on the post-Cultural Revolution years to make it a supplement to Charles Bettelheim's Cultural Revolution and Industrial Organization in China (1974); it is a broad polemic against traditional socialist (Stalinist) methods and a specialized study of &quot;the redistribution of power away from a technocratic elite.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Cách mạng công nghiệp,Industrial revolution</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="z">Trung Quốc,China</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="910" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="b">dqhieu</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
   <subfield code="a">Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Cần Thơ</subfield>
  </datafield>
 </record>
</collection>
