An investigation into appreciation in “perfect spy” by larry berman and its vietnamese version “điệp viên hoàn hảo” by đỗ hùng in perspectives of appraisal theory and functional grammar
This thesis aims to investigate the appreciation used in “Perfect Spy” by Larry Berman and its Vietnamese version “Điệp Viên Hoàn Hảo” by Đỗ Hùng with the objectives of presenting, describing and analysing the evaluative language under the representations of syntactic features in view of Func...
Shranjeno v:
| Format: | Luận văn |
|---|---|
| Jezik: | English |
| Izdano: |
Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Đà Nẵng
2025
|
| Teme: | |
| Online dostop: | https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1287 |
| Oznake: |
Označite
Brez oznak, prvi označite!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ - Đại học Đà Nẵng |
|---|
| Izvleček: | This thesis aims to investigate the appreciation used in “Perfect Spy”
by Larry Berman and its Vietnamese version “Điệp Viên Hoàn Hảo” by Đỗ
Hùng with the objectives of presenting, describing and analysing the
evaluative language under the representations of syntactic features in view of
Functional Grammar and semantic features in view of Appraisal framework.
This contrastive study was conducted with a combination of qualitative and
quantitative method. Within 100 samples of appreciation collected from Larry
Berman's work and those from Đỗ Hùng's translational version, the researcher
attempted to focus on appreciation of simple, compound, compound-complex
sentences in Clause as message and exchange; Nominal group. For semantic
features, three types were examined: reaction, composition and valuation in
positive and negative forms. With each area, this thesis discovers the
similarities as well as differences in linguistic realizations of appreciation in
the two languages. Last but not least, some implications for English language
teaching and translating would be put forward. The study found that it might
be advisable that teachers, leaners and translators should be equipped with not
only sentence structures and nominal groups but semantic forms of reaction,
composition and valuation as well so that they can show a set of evaluations
of products, processes and entities both positive and negative meaning more
effectively and persuasively. |
|---|