The Strange Survival of Liberal England Political Leaders, Moral Values and the Reception of Economic Debate

The title of this collection – the strange survival of Liberal England – is an allusion to the title of George Dangerfield’s classic polemical text, The Strange Death of Liberal England, a study which set the tone for much subsequent and more academic analysis.1 Dangerfield had argued that Briti...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Những tác giả chính: Green, E. H. H, Tanner, D. M
Formato: Livro
Idioma:English
Publicado em: Cambridge University Press 2013
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35830
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
Thư viện lưu trữ: Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt
Descrição
Resumo:The title of this collection – the strange survival of Liberal England – is an allusion to the title of George Dangerfield’s classic polemical text, The Strange Death of Liberal England, a study which set the tone for much subsequent and more academic analysis.1 Dangerfield had argued that British Liberalism was effectively finished as a political creed by 1914. It had proved incapable of addressing the ‘modern’ problems which Britain faced: industrial unrest, nationalist discord, an upsurge of feminist activism – and ultimately, the irrationalism of war. Much subsequent scholarship accepted that ‘moderate’ and ‘bourgeois’ ideologies could not cope with such challenges. From this perspective, the ideas which attracted attention were naturally Marxism and fascism, the ideologies of left and right, in a century dominated by the extremes.2 Britain sat on the edge of these developments, the dull (but safe and rather pleasant) cousin of passionate and ideologically charged continental movements. Although British Liberalism had survived longer than its continental European equivalent, Britain’s version of these developments was the polarisation of politics around a two-party, Labour–Conservative, paradigm: or so historians argued in the 1960s and 1970s.