The power of precedent
The role that precedent plays in constitutional decision making is a perennially divisive subject among scholars of law and American politics. The debate rages over both empirical and normative aspects of the issue: To what extent are the Supreme Court, Congress, and the executive branch constrained...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Undetermined |
| Được phát hành: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2008
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Cần Thơ |
|---|
| LEADER | 01157nam a2200217Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CTU_153385 | ||
| 008 | 210402s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
| 082 | |a 347.73 | ||
| 082 | |b G368 | ||
| 100 | |a Gerhardt, Michael J. | ||
| 245 | 4 | |a The power of precedent | |
| 245 | 0 | |c Michael J. Gerhardt | |
| 260 | |a Oxford | ||
| 260 | |b Oxford University Press | ||
| 260 | |c 2008 | ||
| 520 | |a The role that precedent plays in constitutional decision making is a perennially divisive subject among scholars of law and American politics. The debate rages over both empirical and normative aspects of the issue: To what extent are the Supreme Court, Congress, and the executive branch constrained by precedent? To what extent should they be? Taking up a topic long overdue for comprehensive treatment, Michael Gerhardt connects the vast social science data and legal scholarship to provide the most wide-ranging assessment of precedent in several decades. | ||
| 650 | |a Stare decisis,Law | ||
| 650 | |x Interpretation and construction | ||
| 650 | |z United States,United States | ||
| 904 | |i Bạch Trúc | ||
| 980 | |a Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Cần Thơ | ||