Comte after positivism
This book provides a detailed, systematic reconsideration of the neglected nineteenth-century positivist Auguste Comte. Apart from offering an accurate account of what Comte actually wrote, the book argues that Comte's positivism has never had greater contemporary relevance than now. The aim of...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Undetermined |
| Được phát hành: |
Cambridge,New York
Cambridge University Press
1995
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Cần Thơ |
|---|
| LEADER | 01362nam a2200205Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CTU_174100 | ||
| 008 | 210402s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
| 020 | |c 105 | ||
| 082 | |a 146.4 | ||
| 082 | |b S311 | ||
| 100 | |a Scharff, Robert C. | ||
| 245 | 0 | |a Comte after positivism | |
| 245 | 0 | |c Robert C. Scharff | |
| 260 | |a Cambridge,New York | ||
| 260 | |b Cambridge University Press | ||
| 260 | |c 1995 | ||
| 520 | |a This book provides a detailed, systematic reconsideration of the neglected nineteenth-century positivist Auguste Comte. Apart from offering an accurate account of what Comte actually wrote, the book argues that Comte's positivism has never had greater contemporary relevance than now. The aim of the first part of the book is to rescue Comte from the influential misinterpretation of his work by John Stuart Mill. The second part argues that this deep historically-minded concern with the tradition of philosophy for current philosophical practice places Comte in the same camp as such well-known post-positivists as Richard Rorty, Charles Taylor, and Hilary Putnam. Professor Scharff concludes that, even though he was the first positivist, Comte is also the only positivist who retains his relevance today. | ||
| 650 | |a Positivism,Chủ nghĩa thực chứng | ||
| 904 | |i Năm | ||
| 980 | |a Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Cần Thơ | ||