Excusing crime
The 'classical' view of excuses sees them as rational defects (such as mistake) in the motive force behind an action, but contrasts them with 'denials of responsibility', such as insanity, where the rational defect in that motive force is attributable to a mental defect in the ag...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Lenguaje: | Undetermined English |
| Publicado: |
Oxford,New York
Oxford University Press
2004
|
| Materias: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Trà Vinh |
|---|
| Sumario: | The 'classical' view of excuses sees them as rational defects (such as mistake) in the motive force behind an action, but contrasts them with 'denials of responsibility', such as insanity, where the rational defect in that motive force is attributable to a mental defect in the agent him- or herself. The classical view has a long heritage, and is enshrined in different forms in many of the world's criminal codes, both liberal and non-liberal; however, in this book, Jeremy Horder contends that it is now time to move beyond it |
|---|---|
| Descripción Física: | xx, 295 p. 24 cm |
| ISBN: | 0199225788 9780199225781 |