International justice and the International Criminal Court between sovereignty and the rule of law
Since the Nuremberg Trials of top Nazi leaders following the Second World War, international law has affirmed that no one, whatever their rank or office, is above accountability for their crimes. Yet the Cold War put geopolitical agendas ahead of effective action against war crimes and major human r...
সংরক্ষণ করুন:
| প্রধান লেখক: | |
|---|---|
| অন্যান্য লেখক: | |
| ভাষা: | Undetermined English |
| প্রকাশিত: |
Tokyo,New York
United Nations University Press
2003
|
| বিষয়গুলি: | |
| ট্যাগগুলো: |
ট্যাগ যুক্ত করুন
কোনো ট্যাগ নেই, প্রথমজন হিসাবে ট্যাগ করুন!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Trà Vinh |
|---|
| সংক্ষিপ্ত: | Since the Nuremberg Trials of top Nazi leaders following the Second World War, international law has affirmed that no one, whatever their rank or office, is above accountability for their crimes. Yet the Cold War put geopolitical agendas ahead of effective action against war crimes and major human rights abuses, and no permanent system to address impunity was put in place. It was only with the Cold War's end that governments turned again to international institutions to address impunity, first by establishing International Criminal Tribunals to prosecute genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and then by adopting the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in 1998. Domestic courts also took a role, notably through extradition proceedings against former Chilean President Augusto Pinochet in London, then in Belgium, Senegal, and elsewhere |
|---|---|
| দৈহিক বর্ননা: | xviii, 215 p. 24 cm |
| গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জী: | Includes bibliographical references (p. [193]-209) and index |
| আইসবিএন: | 0199256004 9780199256006 |