Rhetoric and the rule of law A theory of legal reasoning
This book discusses theories of legal reasoning and provides an overall view of the rhetoric of legal justification. It shows how and why lawyers arguments can be rationally persuasive even though rarely, if ever, logically conclusive or compelling. It examines the role of "legal syllogism"...
Đã lưu trong:
Tác giả chính: | |
---|---|
Tác giả khác: | |
Ngôn ngữ: | Undetermined English |
Được phát hành: |
Oxford,New York
Oxford University Press
2005
|
Những chủ đề: | |
Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
Thư viện lưu trữ: | Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Trà Vinh |
---|
LEADER | 01149nam a2200277Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | TVU_12045 | ||
008 | 210423s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
020 | |a 0198268785 | ||
020 | |a 9780198268789 | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | |a 340.11 | ||
082 | |b N201 | ||
100 | |a MacCormick, Neil | ||
245 | 0 | |a Rhetoric and the rule of law | |
245 | 2 | |b A theory of legal reasoning | |
245 | 0 | |c Neil MacCormick | |
260 | |a Oxford,New York | ||
260 | |b Oxford University Press | ||
260 | |c 2005 | ||
300 | |a 287 p. | ||
300 | |b ill. | ||
300 | |c 24 cm | ||
520 | |a This book discusses theories of legal reasoning and provides an overall view of the rhetoric of legal justification. It shows how and why lawyers arguments can be rationally persuasive even though rarely, if ever, logically conclusive or compelling. It examines the role of "legal syllogism" and universality of legal reasoning, looking at arguments of consequentialism and principle, and concludes by questioning the infallibility of judges as lawmakers | ||
650 | |a Law; Law; Rule of law | ||
700 | |a Neil MacCormick | ||
980 | |a Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Trà Vinh |