SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC FEATURES OF OBJECTS IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE
In both English and Vietnamese, object with various aspects in its syntax and semantics is considered one of basic constituents of the clause. This study is designed to yield an explicit analysis from which the features of objects have been drawn syntactically and semantically. It comes from the stu...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Đà Nẵng
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1692 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institutions: | Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ - Đại học Đà Nẵng |
|---|
| id |
oai:data.ufl.udn.vn:UFL-1692 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| institution |
Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ - Đại học Đà Nẵng |
| collection |
DSpace |
| language |
English |
| topic |
SEMANTIC, SYNTACTIC FEATURES OBJECTS IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE |
| spellingShingle |
SEMANTIC, SYNTACTIC FEATURES OBJECTS IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE ĐẶNG THỊ THỦY SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC FEATURES OF OBJECTS IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE |
| description |
In both English and Vietnamese, object with various aspects in its syntax and semantics is considered one of basic constituents of the clause. This study is designed to yield an explicit analysis from which the features of objects have been drawn syntactically and semantically. It comes from the study that objects in English and Vietnamese, apart from the similarities, reveal quite many differences which are regarded as language barriers for the learners and the chief cause of errors made by Vietnamese learners of English in using sentences including objects. Accordingly, some suggestions to the language teaching and learning have been offered in the hope that Vietnamese learners of English can get great benefit from the study. |
| author2 |
Assoc. Prof. Dr. TRẦN HỮU MẠNH |
| author_facet |
Assoc. Prof. Dr. TRẦN HỮU MẠNH ĐẶNG THỊ THỦY |
| format |
Thesis |
| author |
ĐẶNG THỊ THỦY |
| author_sort |
ĐẶNG THỊ THỦY |
| title |
SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC FEATURES OF OBJECTS IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE |
| title_short |
SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC FEATURES OF OBJECTS IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE |
| title_full |
SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC FEATURES OF OBJECTS IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE |
| title_fullStr |
SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC FEATURES OF OBJECTS IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE |
| title_full_unstemmed |
SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC FEATURES OF OBJECTS IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE |
| title_sort |
semantic and syntactic features of objects in english and vietnamese |
| publisher |
Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Đà Nẵng |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| url |
https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1692 |
| _version_ |
1848488779906547712 |
| spelling |
oai:data.ufl.udn.vn:UFL-16922025-03-19T03:49:36Z SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC FEATURES OF OBJECTS IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE LV ThS 331 ĐẶNG THỊ THỦY Assoc. Prof. Dr. TRẦN HỮU MẠNH SEMANTIC, SYNTACTIC FEATURES OBJECTS IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE In both English and Vietnamese, object with various aspects in its syntax and semantics is considered one of basic constituents of the clause. This study is designed to yield an explicit analysis from which the features of objects have been drawn syntactically and semantically. It comes from the study that objects in English and Vietnamese, apart from the similarities, reveal quite many differences which are regarded as language barriers for the learners and the chief cause of errors made by Vietnamese learners of English in using sentences including objects. Accordingly, some suggestions to the language teaching and learning have been offered in the hope that Vietnamese learners of English can get great benefit from the study. TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF AUTHRORSHIP ..i ABSTRACT .ii TABLE OF CONTENTS iii ABBREVIATIONS vi LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES………………………………………...vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1. Rationale ..1 1.2. The Significant of the Study ..4 1.3. The Scope of the Study…………………………………………………...4 1.4. Research Questions……………………………………………………....5 1.5. Hypotheses……………………………………………………………….5 1.6. The Organization of the Study…………………………………………...5 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ..7 2.1. The Review of Previous Research ..7 2.2. Theoretical Background 10 2.2.1. Clause Structure 10 2.2.1.1. Definition of the Clause…………………………………………10 2.2.1.2. The Elements of the Clause……………………………………..11 2.2.1.3. Clause Types……………………………………………………15 2.2.1.4. Clause Patterns………………………………………………….19 2.2.2. The Notion of Objects in Grammar…………………………………20 2.2.2.1. Definition of Object……………………………………………..20 2.2.2.2. Types of Objects………………………………………………...21 2.2.2.3. Forms of Objects………………………………………………..21 2.2.2.4. The Distinction between Objects and Complements……………22 2.2.3. The Grammar of Experiential Meaning: Transitivity……………….24 2.2.3.1. Process, Participant, and Circumstance…………………………24 2.2.3.2. Process Types…………………………………………………...26 2.2.3.3. Semantic Roles and Grammatical Relations……………………28 2.2.4. Ergative Structures………………………………………………….30 2.3. Summary……………………………………………………………....31 CHAPTER 3: METHODS AND PROCEDURES 3.1 Aims and Objectives 32 3.1.1. Aim………………………………………………………………….32 3.1.2. Objectives 32 3.2. Research Design 33 3.3. Research Methodology………………………………………………….33 3.4. Procedures………………………………………………………………33 3.5. Data Collection………………………………………………………….34 3.6. Description of Population and Samples………………………………...35 3.7. Data Analysis…………………………………………………………...36 3.8. Reliability and Validity…………………………………………………37 3.9. Summary………………………………………………………………..37 CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 4.1. Syntactic Features of Objects in English and in Vietnamese…………...38 4.1.1. Syntactic Properties of Direct Object……………………………………38 4.1.2. Syntactic Properties of Indirect Object……………………………...........48 4.1.3. Realizations of Objects in English and in Vietnamese…………………...54 4.1.3.1. Realizations of Objects in English………………………………......54 4.1.3.2. Realizations of Objects in Vietnamese……………………………...56 4.2. Semantic Features of Objects in English and Vietnamese…………………….57 4.2.1. Affected and Effected Objects…………………………………………..58 4.2.1.1. Affected Object……………………………………………………58 4.2.1.2. Effected Object……………………………………………………59 4.2.2. Range Object…………………………………………………………..62 4.2.3. Phenomenon Object……………………………………………………66 4.2.4. Verbiage Object………………………………………………………..68 4.2.5. Locative Object………………………………………………………...69 4.2.6. Instrumental Object…………………………………………………….70 4.2.7. Recipient and Beneficiary Indirect Objects……………………………...71 4.2.7.1. Recipient Indirect Object…………………………………………..71 4.2.7.2. Beneficiary Indirect Object………………………………………...72 4.2.8. Affected Indirect Object………………………………………………...75 4.3. Comparison between Objects and Complements in English and Vietnamese…76 4.3.1. Object and Subject Complement………………………………………..76 4.3.2. Object and Object Complement………………………………………...77 4.4.Survey on the Errors made by high school Students …………............................80 4.4.1. The Results of the Survey Exercise…………………………………….80 4.4.2. Errors Analysis…………………………………………………………82 4.5. Summary……………………………………………………………………84 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION 5.1. Concluding Remarks………………………………………………………...85 5.2. Implication for English Language Teaching and Learning……………………87 5.3. Limitations and Suggestions for Further Study……………………………….90 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………..92 APPENDIX 1: SUGGESTED EXERCISES……………………………………..97 APPENDIX 2: SURVEY EXERCISE………………………………………….101 QUYẾT ĐỊNH VỀ VIỆC GIAO ĐỀ TÀI VÀ TRÁCH NHIỆM HƯỚNG DẪN LUẬN VĂN THẠC SĨ 2025-03-19T03:49:30Z 2025-03-19T03:49:30Z 2008 Thesis https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1692 en application/msword application/msword application/msword Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Đà Nẵng |