Towards Evaluation the Cornerstone of Smart City Development: Case Study in Dalat City, Vietnam

Over the past decade, the process of urbanization in Vietnam has taken place rapidly, leading to strong social disturbances and causing cities to face many problems. All these challenges have put pressure on urban planning and governance to make adjustments to allow cities to become livable. Moreove...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Đã lưu trong:
Chi tiết về thư mục
Những tác giả chính: Hoàng, Việt Bách Khoa, Sung-Kyun Kim
Định dạng: Journal article
Ngôn ngữ:English
Được phát hành: MDPI 2022
Những chủ đề:
Truy cập trực tuyến:http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/1022
https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3010001
Các nhãn: Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
Thư viện lưu trữ: Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt
id oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:123456789-1022
record_format dspace
institution Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt
collection Thư viện số
language English
topic Smart city; SWOT Analysis; Municipal strategies; Dalat city
spellingShingle Smart city; SWOT Analysis; Municipal strategies; Dalat city
Hoàng, Việt Bách Khoa
Sung-Kyun Kim
Towards Evaluation the Cornerstone of Smart City Development: Case Study in Dalat City, Vietnam
description Over the past decade, the process of urbanization in Vietnam has taken place rapidly, leading to strong social disturbances and causing cities to face many problems. All these challenges have put pressure on urban planning and governance to make adjustments to allow cities to become livable. Moreover, the quality of urbanization is reflected not only in growth but also in harmonious development in all aspects. The urban development process must accordingly be handled by more smart solutions. Smart city development is becoming a trend not only in urban areas all over the world but also in Vietnam. The paper aims to assess the initial phases of the smart city development process in Dalat City. It first evaluated a four-dimensional smart city’s strategic elements of city vision and transformation known as Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats. Then, based on these analytical characteristics, an adaptive model for development is suggested. This paper extends the previous research on smart cities and draws attention to further study on smart city development in Vietnam.
format Journal article
author Hoàng, Việt Bách Khoa
Sung-Kyun Kim
author_facet Hoàng, Việt Bách Khoa
Sung-Kyun Kim
author_sort Hoàng, Việt Bách Khoa
title Towards Evaluation the Cornerstone of Smart City Development: Case Study in Dalat City, Vietnam
title_short Towards Evaluation the Cornerstone of Smart City Development: Case Study in Dalat City, Vietnam
title_full Towards Evaluation the Cornerstone of Smart City Development: Case Study in Dalat City, Vietnam
title_fullStr Towards Evaluation the Cornerstone of Smart City Development: Case Study in Dalat City, Vietnam
title_full_unstemmed Towards Evaluation the Cornerstone of Smart City Development: Case Study in Dalat City, Vietnam
title_sort towards evaluation the cornerstone of smart city development: case study in dalat city, vietnam
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2022
url http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/1022
https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3010001
_version_ 1768305918890475520
spelling oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:123456789-10222022-09-15T05:40:22Z Towards Evaluation the Cornerstone of Smart City Development: Case Study in Dalat City, Vietnam Hoàng, Việt Bách Khoa Sung-Kyun Kim Smart city; SWOT Analysis; Municipal strategies; Dalat city Over the past decade, the process of urbanization in Vietnam has taken place rapidly, leading to strong social disturbances and causing cities to face many problems. All these challenges have put pressure on urban planning and governance to make adjustments to allow cities to become livable. Moreover, the quality of urbanization is reflected not only in growth but also in harmonious development in all aspects. The urban development process must accordingly be handled by more smart solutions. Smart city development is becoming a trend not only in urban areas all over the world but also in Vietnam. The paper aims to assess the initial phases of the smart city development process in Dalat City. It first evaluated a four-dimensional smart city’s strategic elements of city vision and transformation known as Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats. Then, based on these analytical characteristics, an adaptive model for development is suggested. This paper extends the previous research on smart cities and draws attention to further study on smart city development in Vietnam. 3 1 1-16 2022-09-15T05:40:19Z 2022-09-15T05:40:19Z 2020 Journal article Bài báo đăng trên tạp chí thuộc ISI, bao gồm book chapter http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/1022 https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3010001 en Smart Cities 2624-6511 s 1. UN DESA. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision; United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2018. 2. Cohen, B. Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. J. Technol. Soc. 2006, 28, 63–80. [CrossRef] 3. Kearns, A.; Paddison, R. New Challenges for Urban Governance. Urban Stud. 2000, 37, 845–850. [CrossRef] 4. Mutemeri, N.; Callaghan, C.; Hermanus, M. Good Practice Note Public Infrastructure and Mining; University of the Witwatersrand: Johannesburg, South Africa, 2010. 5. Tallman, S.; Fladmoe-Lindquist, K. Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2002, 45, 116–135. [CrossRef] 6. Choongik, C.; Chun-il, K. The 4th Industrial Revolution, Smart Cities, and Sustainable Urban Regeneration: A Perspective Study. J. Environ. Policy Admin. 2017, 25, 61–91. 7. PWC. Global Industry 4.0 Survey, Industry 4.0: Building the Digital Enterprise. Available online: https://www.pwc. com/gx/en/industries/industries-4.0/landing-page/industry-4.0-building-your-digital-enterprise-april-2016.pdf (accessed on 3 September 2019). 8. IHS Technology. Smart Cities to Rise Fourfold in Number from 2013 to 2025. Available online: https://news. ihsmarkit.com/press-release/design-supply-chain-media/smart-cities-rise-fourfold-number-2013--2025 (accessed on 6 September 2019). 9. Mulligan, C.E.A.; Olsson, M. Architectural implications of smart city business models: An evolutionary perspective. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2013, 51, 80–85. [CrossRef] 10. Dameri, R.P.; Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. Smart City. In Smart City and Value Creation; Dameri, R.P., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 1–12. 11. World Bank, MPI. Vietnam 2035: Toward Prosperity, Creativity, Equity, and Democracy; The World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. 12. Hieu, N.N. Urban boundary and growth management in the peri-urban area. Vietnam. Archit. 2015, 12, 24–31. 13. World Bank. Vietnam Urbanization Review—Technical Assistance Report Vietnam; The World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. 14. UN-Habitat. Vietnam Housing Sector Profile; UN-Habitat: Nairobi, Kenya, 2014. 15. Ha, C.T.T. Environmental Pollution in Vietnam: Challenges in Management and Protection. J. Viet. Env. 2018, 9, 1–3. 16. VietnamGovernmentPortal. DecisionNo. 950/QD-TTGDated 01/08/2018. Availableonline: http://vanban.chinhphu. vn/portal/page/portal/chinhphu/hethongvanban?class_id=2&_page=1&mode=detail&document_id=194337 (accessed on 10 November 2019).Smart Cities 2020, 3, 1 13 of 15 17. MIC. Vietnam ICT Index Anual Report 2017; Vietnam government, Ministry of Information and Communications: Ha Noi, Vietnam, 2017. 18. Araya, D. Smart Cities and the Network Society: Toward Commons-Driven Governance. In Smart Cities as Democratic Ecologies; Araya, D., Ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills, UK; ASC: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 11–22. 19. Kumar, T.M. E-democracy for Smart Cities. In Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements; Kumar, T.M., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Singapore, 2017; pp. 1–47. 20. Yang, C.; Huang, Q.; Li, Z.; Liu, K.; Hu, F. Big data and cloud computing: Innovation opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2017, 10, 13–53. [CrossRef] 21. Komninos, N. Intelligent cities: Towards interactive and global innovation environments. Int. J. Innov. Reg. Dev. 2009, 1, 337–355. [CrossRef] 22. Kramers, A.; Höjer, M.; Lövehagen, N.; Wangel, J. Smart sustainable cities–exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities. Environ. Model Softw. 2014, 56, 52–62. [CrossRef] 23. Neirotti, P.; De Marco, A.; Cagliano, A.C.; Mangano, G.; Scorrano, F. Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 2014, 38, 25–36. [CrossRef] 24. Niaros, V.; Kostakis, V.; Drechsler, W. Making in the smart city: The emergence of makerspaces. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 1143–1152. [CrossRef] 25. Wolfram, M. Deconstructing Smart Cities: An Intertextual Reading of Concepts and Practices for Integrated Urban and ICT Development. In Proceedings of the Real Corp 2012: Re-Mixing the City—Towards Sustainability and Resilience, Aachen, Germany, 14–16 May 2012. 26. Giffinger, R.; Fertner, C.; Kramar, H.; Kalasek, R.; Pichler-Milanovic, N.; Meijers, E. Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. Available online: http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_ report.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2019). 27. Pelley, J. Building smart-growth communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 28–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 28. Meijer, A.; Bolívar, M.P.R. Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2016, 82, 392–408. [CrossRef] 29. Zaheer, A.; Peter, N. Redefining the Smart City: Culture, Metabolism and Governance. Smart Cities 2018, 1, 4–25. 30. ITU. What is a smart Sustainable City? Available online: http://itunews.itu.int/en/5215-what-is-a-smartsustainable-city.note.aspx (accessed on 12 September 2019). 31. Zygiaris, S. Smart city reference model: Assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems. J. Knowl. Econ. 2012, 4, 217–231. [CrossRef] 32. Vietnam Ministry of Construction. Smart City Vision in Vietnam. Available online: http://www.moc.gov.vn/ vi/thong-tin-tu-lieu/-/tin-chi-tiet/ek4I/86/447727/tam-nhin-do-thithong-minh-tai-viet-nam.html (accessed on 16 September 2019). 33. PRB. An Overview of Population and Development in Vietnam. Available online: https://www.prb.org/ anoverviewofpopulationanddevelopmentinvietnam/ (accessed on 16 September 2019). 34. Fraser, C. E-government: The Canadian experience. Dalhousie J. Interdiscip. Manage. 2009, 5, 1–14. 35. Mattoni, B.; Gugliermetti, F.; Bisegna, F. A multilevel method to assess and design the renovation and integration of smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2015, 15, 105–119. [CrossRef] 36. Dennis, L. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov. Inform. Q. 2012, 29, 446–454. 37. Maria, L.M.L.; Joan, C.L.; Joaquim, M.F. Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 2015, 90, 611–622. 38. Kehua, S.; Jie, L.; Hongbo, F. Smart city and the applications. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Electronics, Ningbo, China, 9–11 September 2011. 39. Eleonora, R.S.; Raffaella, R.S.; Valentina, V.; Ina, M.; Enrico, A. Smart Cities: Case Studies. In Smart Cities Atlas; Eleonora, R.S., Raffaella, R.S., Valentina, V., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 47–140. 40. Coman, A.; Ronen, B. Focused SWOT: Diagnosing critical strengths and weaknesses. In. J. Prod. Res. 2009, 47, 5677–5689. [CrossRef] 41. Houben, G.; Lenie, K.; Vanhoof, K. A knowledge-based SWOT-analysis system as an instrument for strategic planning in small and medium sized enterprises. Decis. Support Syst. 1999, 26, 125–135. [CrossRef] 42. Warren, K. Strategic Management Dynamics; Warren, K., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2008.Smart Cities 2020, 3, 1 14 of 15 43. Marques, J.F. How Politically Correct Is Political Correctness? A SWOT Analysis of This Phenomenon. Bus. Soc. 2009, 48, 257–266. [CrossRef] 44. Evans, C.; Wright, A. How to conduct a SWOT analysis. Br. J. Manag. 2009, 24, 10–34. 45. Helms, M.M. Exploring SWOT analysis—where are we now?: A review of academic research from the last decade. J. Strat. Manag. 2010, 3, 215–251. [CrossRef] 46. Gunn, R.; Williams, W. Strategic tools: An empirical investigation into strategy in practice in the UK. Strateg. Chang. 2007, 16, 201–221. [CrossRef] 47. Grant, R.M. Why strategy teaching should be theory based. J. Manag. Inq. 2008, 17, 276–291. [CrossRef] 48. Gibis, B.J.; Corabian, P.; Meiesaar, K.; Koppel, A.; Jacobs, P. Application of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis in the development of a health technology assessment program. Health Policy 2001, 58, 27–35. [CrossRef] 49. Somers, M.J.; Passerini, K.; Parhankangas, A.; Casal, J. Using mind maps to study how business school students and faculty organize and apply general business knowledge. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2014, 12, 1–13. [CrossRef] 50. Kern, C.S.; Bush, K.L.; McCleish, J.M. Mind-mapped care plans: Integrating an innovative educational tool as an alternative to traditional care plans. J. Nurs. Educ. 2006, 45, 112–119. [CrossRef] 51. Lamdong Government. Resolution No. 03-NQ/TW Dated 13/09/2016. Available online: http://www.lamdong. gov.vn/vi-VN/a/vankiendang/Lists/VB%20QPPL/Attachments/99/nqs03.pdf (accessed on 25 August 2019). 52. Khoa, H.V.B.; Sung-Kyun, K. Developing Smart City: Based on the Assessment of Smart Projects in Medium-Size Cities, Vietnam. Am. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2019, 56, 38–49. 53. Glasmeier, A.; Christopherson, S. Thinking about Smart Cities. Camb. J. Regions. Econ. Soc. 2015, 8, 3–12. [CrossRef] 54. Lazaroiu, G.C.; Roscia, M. Definition methodology for the smart cities model. Energy 2012, 47, 326–332. [CrossRef] 55. Schuurman, D.; Baccarne, B.; De Marez, L. Mechant, Smart ideas for smart cities: Investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2012, 7, 49–62. [CrossRef] 56. Lamdong Government. Implementation of the Project Building Dalat City Become a Smart City Period 2018—2025; Department of Information and Communication: Dalat, Vietnam, 2019. 57. DalatCity People’s Committee. Implementation of Dalat-Online Application; Dalat Government: Dalat, Vietnam, 2019. 58. Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. The changing face of a city government: A case study of Philly311. Gov. Inf. Q. 2014, 31, S1–S9. [CrossRef] 59. Lamdong Government. Project of Building Dalat to Become a Smart City in the Period of 2017–2020; Office of Lamdong Provincial People’s Committee: Dalat, Vietnam, 2017. 60. Irfan, A.H.; Anwar, A.S.; Muhammad, A.U.; Bhawani, S.C.; Tahir, R. Multi-criteria assessment of smart city transformation based on SWOT analysis. In Proceedings of the 2015 5th National Symposium on Information Technology: Towards New Smart World (NSITNSW), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 17–19 February 2015. 61. King, S.; Cotterill, S. Transformational government? The role of information technology in delivering citizen-centric local public services. Local Gov. Stud. 2007, 33, 333–354. [CrossRef] 62. Lee, J.; Lee, H. Developing and validating a citizen-centric typology for smart city services. Gov. Inf. Q. 2014, 31, 93–105. [CrossRef] 63. Hall, P. Creative cities and economic development. Urban Stud. 2000, 37, 633–649. [CrossRef] 64. Boulton, A.; Brunn, S.D.; Devriendt, L. Cyber Infrastructures and “Smart” World Cities: Physical, Human, and Soft Infrastructures. In International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities; Taylor, P., Derudder, B., Hoyler, M., Witlox, F., Eds.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2011. 65. Schaffers, H.; Komninos, N.; Pallot, M. Smart Cities as Innovation Ecosystems Sustained by the Future Internet. Available online: https://www.urenio.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/2012-FIREBALL-WhitePaper-Final.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2019). 66. Nam, T.; Pardo, T. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government on Research Conference on Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, College Park, MD, USA, 12–15 June 2011.Smart Cities 2020, 3, 1 15 of 15 67. Lee, J.H.; Hancock, M.G.; Hu, M.C. Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 89, 80–99. [CrossRef] 68. Lee, J.H.; Phaal, R.; Lee, S.H. An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 286–306. [CrossRef] 69. Landsbergen, D.J.; Wolken, G., Jr. Realizing the promise: Government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology. Public. Admin. Rev. 2001, 61, 206–220. [CrossRef] 70. Soumaya, B.L. How to strategize smart cities: Revealing the SMART model. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1414–1419. 71. Li, C.S.; Darema, F.; Chang, V. Distributed behavior model orchestration in cognitive internet of things solution. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2017, 12, 414–434. [CrossRef] 72. Weisi, F.; Ping, P. A discussion on smart city management based on meta-synthesis method. Manag. Sci. 2014, 8, 68–72. 73. Allwinkle, S.; Cruickshank, P. Creating smarter cities: An overview. J. Urban Technol. 2011, 18, 1–16. [CrossRef] 74. Caprotti, F.; Cowley, R. Interrogating Urban Experiments. Urban Geogr. 2017, 38, 1441–1450. [CrossRef] 75. Dupont, L.; Morel, L.; Guidat, C. Innovative public-private partnership to support Smart City: The case of “Chaire REVES”. J. Strateg. Manag. 2015, 8, 245–265. [CrossRef] 76. Novotný, R.; Kuchta, R.; Kadlec, J. Smart city concept, applications and services. J. Telecommun. Syst. Manag. 2014, 3, 117. 77. Dahiya, B. Cities in Asia 2012: Demographics, economics, poverty, environment and governance. Cites 2012, 29, 44–61. [CrossRef] 78. Bulu, M. Upgrading a city via technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 89, 63–67. [CrossRef] 79. Abastante, F.; Lami, I.M.; Lombardi, P. An Integrated Participative Spatial Decision Support System for Smart Energy Urban Scenarios: A Financial and Economic Approach. Buildings 2017, 7, 103. [CrossRef] 80. Kinawy, S.; El-Diraby, T.; Konomi, H. Customizing information delivery to project stakeholders in the smart city. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 286–300. [CrossRef] 81. Orłowski, C.; Ziółkowski, A.; Orłowski, A.; Kapła´nski., P.; Sitek, T.; Pokrzywnicki, W. Designing Aggregate KPIs as a Method of Implementing Decision-Making Processes in the Management of Smart Cities. In Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXV—Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Nguyen, N., Kowalczyk, R., Orłowski, C., Ziółkowski, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, 2016; Volume 9990 MDPI ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, BASEL, SWITZERLAND, CH-4052