ASSESSING SELECT PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISASTER AND RISK REDUCTION MANAGEMENT DURING PANDEMIC RESTRICTION IN THE PHILIPPINES

This study uses a descriptive methodology to assess the implementation of disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM) by selected public schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. Survey data were collected with a two-part questionnaire to construct a demographic profile of the respondents and assess t...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Đã lưu trong:

Chi tiết về thư mục
Tác giả chính:	Pandapatan, M. Alican
Định dạng:	Bài viết
Ngôn ngữ:	English
Được phát hành:	Trường Đại học Đà Lạt 2024
Những chủ đề:	Assessment DRRM Implementation Public school
Truy cập trực tuyến:	https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/256896 https://tckh.dlu.edu.vn/index.php/tckhdhdl/article/view/1125
Các nhãn:	Thêm thẻ Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!

Thư viện lưu trữ:	Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt

id	oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-256896
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-2568962024-12-29T08:58:20Z ASSESSING SELECT PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISASTER AND RISK REDUCTION MANAGEMENT DURING PANDEMIC RESTRICTION IN THE PHILIPPINES Pandapatan, M. Alican Assessment DRRM Implementation Public school This study uses a descriptive methodology to assess the implementation of disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM) by selected public schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. Survey data were collected with a two-part questionnaire to construct a demographic profile of the respondents and assess the level of DRRM implementation by the schools in four thematic areas: disaster prevention and mitigation, disaster preparedness, disaster response, and disaster rehabilitation and recovery. Eighty-one teachers from five high schools participated in the survey. The participants were diverse in terms of age, sex, length of service, field of specialization, and level of training on DRRM. The level of DRRM implementation was high in all four thematic areas. Means and standard deviations were 3.06 ± 0.49 for disaster prevention and mitigation, 2.99 ± 0.51 for disaster preparedness, 2.99 ± 0.59 for disaster response, and 2.98 ± 0.49 for disaster rehabilitation and recovery. Overall, the four thematic areas were carefully observed and implemented by the surveyed schools during the pandemic. The schools adhered to the standards prescribed by the national DRRM council and reinforced by order of the Philippine Department of Education. It is highly recommended that schools maximize their implementation in these four areas and create ways to enhance their ability to deal with disasters. 2024-12-29T00:39:16Z 2024-12-29T00:39:16Z 2024 Article 0866-787X https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/256896 https://tckh.dlu.edu.vn/index.php/tckhdhdl/article/view/1125 10.37569/DalatUniversity.14.2.1125(2024) en Dalat University Journal of Science, Volume 14, Issue 2; p.16-36 application/pdf Trường Đại học Đà Lạt
institution	Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt
collection	Thư viện số
language	English
topic	Assessment DRRM Implementation Public school
spellingShingle	Assessment DRRM Implementation Public school Pandapatan, M. Alican ASSESSING SELECT PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISASTER AND RISK REDUCTION MANAGEMENT DURING PANDEMIC RESTRICTION IN THE PHILIPPINES
description	This study uses a descriptive methodology to assess the implementation of disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM) by selected public schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. Survey data were collected with a two-part questionnaire to construct a demographic profile of the respondents and assess the level of DRRM implementation by the schools in four thematic areas: disaster prevention and mitigation, disaster preparedness, disaster response, and disaster rehabilitation and recovery. Eighty-one teachers from five high schools participated in the survey. The participants were diverse in terms of age, sex, length of service, field of specialization, and level of training on DRRM. The level of DRRM implementation was high in all four thematic areas. Means and standard deviations were 3.06 ± 0.49 for disaster prevention and mitigation, 2.99 ± 0.51 for disaster preparedness, 2.99 ± 0.59 for disaster response, and 2.98 ± 0.49 for disaster rehabilitation and recovery. Overall, the four thematic areas were carefully observed and implemented by the surveyed schools during the pandemic. The schools adhered to the standards prescribed by the national DRRM council and reinforced by order of the Philippine Department of Education. It is highly recommended that schools maximize their implementation in these four areas and create ways to enhance their ability to deal with disasters.
format	Article
author	Pandapatan, M. Alican
author_facet	Pandapatan, M. Alican
author_sort	Pandapatan, M. Alican
title	ASSESSING SELECT PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISASTER AND RISK REDUCTION MANAGEMENT DURING PANDEMIC RESTRICTION IN THE PHILIPPINES
title_short	ASSESSING SELECT PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISASTER AND RISK REDUCTION MANAGEMENT DURING PANDEMIC RESTRICTION IN THE PHILIPPINES
title_full	ASSESSING SELECT PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISASTER AND RISK REDUCTION MANAGEMENT DURING PANDEMIC RESTRICTION IN THE PHILIPPINES
title_fullStr	ASSESSING SELECT PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISASTER AND RISK REDUCTION MANAGEMENT DURING PANDEMIC RESTRICTION IN THE PHILIPPINES
title_full_unstemmed	ASSESSING SELECT PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISASTER AND RISK REDUCTION MANAGEMENT DURING PANDEMIC RESTRICTION IN THE PHILIPPINES
title_sort	assessing select public schools disaster and risk reduction management during pandemic restriction in the philippines
publisher	Trường Đại học Đà Lạt
publishDate	2024
url	https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/256896 https://tckh.dlu.edu.vn/index.php/tckhdhdl/article/view/1125
_version_	1822629992926806016

ASSESSING SELECT PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISASTER AND RISK REDUCTION MANAGEMENT DURING PANDEMIC RESTRICTION IN THE PHILIPPINES

Những quyển sách tương tự