So sánh hiệu quả sửa lỗi khi sử dụng nhận xét tự động của Grammarly với nhận xét của giáo viên để cải thiện kỹ năng viết học thuật của người học ngoại ngữ
Writing skills are essential in language learning, and providing effective feedback plays a crucial role in improving learners’ writing abilities. Over the years, enhancing students’ writing skills has primarily relied on teacher feedback. However, the introduction of automated feedback tools like G...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | Vietnamese |
| Publicado em: |
2026
|
| Acesso em linha: | https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/341663 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
|---|
| Resumo: | Writing skills are essential in language learning, and providing effective feedback plays a crucial role in improving learners’ writing abilities. Over the years, enhancing students’ writing skills has primarily relied on teacher feedback. However, the introduction of automated feedback tools like Grammarly has offered a time-saving and accessible al-ternative for learners. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Grammarly’s automated feedback with traditional teacher feedback in improving academic writing skills. By reviewing existing studies and analyzing data f-rom various educational contexts, the author finds that while Grammarly feedback effectively addresses surface errors like grammar and punctuation, teacher feedback offers more comprehensive guidance on content, coherence, and consistency. |
|---|