Dynamics of contention
Over the past two decades the study of social movements, revolution, democratization and other non-routine politics has flourished. And yet research on the topic remains highly fragmented, reflecting the influence of at least three traditional divisions. The first of these reflects the view that var...
Đã lưu trong:
| Những tác giả chính: | , |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Được phát hành: |
Cambridge University
2013
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/34496 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
|---|
| id |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-34496 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-344962014-01-20T03:37:20Z Dynamics of contention McAdam, Doug Tarrow, Sidney G Collective behavior Social movements Revolutions Over the past two decades the study of social movements, revolution, democratization and other non-routine politics has flourished. And yet research on the topic remains highly fragmented, reflecting the influence of at least three traditional divisions. The first of these reflects the view that various forms of contention are distinct and should be studied independent of others. Separate literatures have developed around the study of social movements, revolutions and industrial conflict. A second approach to the study of political contention denies the possibility of general theory in deference to a grounding in the temporal and spatial particulars of any given episode of contention. The study of contentious politics are left to 'area specialists' and/or historians with a thorough knowledge of the time and place in question. Finally, overlaid on these two divisions are stylized theoretical traditions - structuralist, culturalist, and rationalist - that have developed largely in isolation from one another. 2013-07-12T06:59:42Z 2013-07-12T06:59:42Z 2001 Book http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/34496 en application/pdf Cambridge University |
| institution |
Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
| collection |
Thư viện số |
| language |
English |
| topic |
Collective behavior Social movements Revolutions |
| spellingShingle |
Collective behavior Social movements Revolutions McAdam, Doug Tarrow, Sidney G Dynamics of contention |
| description |
Over the past two decades the study of social movements, revolution, democratization and other non-routine politics has flourished. And yet research on the topic remains highly fragmented, reflecting the influence of at least three traditional divisions. The first of these reflects the view that various forms of contention are distinct and should be studied independent of others. Separate literatures have developed around the study of social movements, revolutions and industrial conflict. A second approach to the study of political contention denies the possibility of general theory in deference to a grounding in the temporal and spatial particulars of any given episode of contention. The study of contentious politics are left to 'area specialists' and/or historians with a thorough knowledge of the time and place in question. Finally, overlaid on these two divisions are stylized theoretical traditions - structuralist, culturalist, and rationalist - that have developed largely in isolation from one another. |
| format |
Book |
| author |
McAdam, Doug Tarrow, Sidney G |
| author_facet |
McAdam, Doug Tarrow, Sidney G |
| author_sort |
McAdam, Doug |
| title |
Dynamics of contention |
| title_short |
Dynamics of contention |
| title_full |
Dynamics of contention |
| title_fullStr |
Dynamics of contention |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Dynamics of contention |
| title_sort |
dynamics of contention |
| publisher |
Cambridge University |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| url |
http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/34496 |
| _version_ |
1757675507077349376 |