Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference
This volume again covers a broad range of topics. Argumentation is central to legal reasoning and therefore it is no surprise that researchers have focused on computational theories of argumentation. In this book four papers are dedicated to this topic. Atkinson & Bench-Capon compare disputes...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Được phát hành: |
IOS Press
2013
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35104 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
|---|
| Tóm tắt: | This volume again covers a broad range of topics. Argumentation is central to legal
reasoning and therefore it is no surprise that researchers have focused on computational
theories of argumentation. In this book four papers are dedicated to this topic.
Atkinson & Bench-Capon compare disputes as dialectical trees to other abstract systems
for argument representation. Bex et al. focus on causal-abductive reasoning and
default-style argumentation to deal with stories, evidence and generalisations in the legal
domain. Prakken & Sartor study formal models of representation of presumptions and
their effects on the burden of proof. Chorley & Bench-Capon add the possibility of State
interventions to improve the outcome of previous research on an argument scheme for
practical reasoning. |
|---|