Truth, Error, and Criminal Law An Essay in Legal Epistemology
After puzzling over the relevant passages, he replied candidly: “No.” This book dates from that conversation. Probably as much to get me out of his hair as anything else, Brian put me onto LexisNexis, that wonderful repository of all things legal on the Internet. I started reading other Supreme C...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Được phát hành: |
Cambridge University Press
2013
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35457 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
|---|
| Tóm tắt: | After puzzling over the relevant passages, he replied candidly: “No.”
This book dates from that conversation. Probably as much to get me out of his
hair as anything else, Brian put me onto LexisNexis, that wonderful repository
of all things legal on the Internet. I started reading other Supreme Court cases
discussing reasonable doubt, hoping that would set me straight. It did not. This
book is the end product of my quest for an answer to that initial and seemingly
innocuous question. As these things always do, my puzzle about reasonable
doubt mushroomed into worries about a plethora of epistemic notions (the benefit
of the doubt, the presumption of innocence, the burden of proof, relevance,
and reliability) widely used by the judiciary and academic lawyers alike |
|---|