The Migration of Constitutional Ideas
Usually judges ask the questions, but on this night the roles were reversed. The occasion was a public conversation between United States Supreme Court Justices Breyer and Scalia, answering questions posed by constitutional scholar Norman Dorsen.1 The topic was the ‘Constitutional Relevance of F...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Được phát hành: |
Cambridge University Press
2013
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35538 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
|---|
| Tóm tắt: | Usually judges ask the questions, but on this night the roles were reversed.
The occasion was a public conversation between United States Supreme
Court Justices Breyer and Scalia, answering questions posed by constitutional
scholar Norman Dorsen.1 The topic was the ‘Constitutional
Relevance of Foreign Court Decisions’ to the Court’s constitutional case
law. For a court routinely called upon to address the most divisive issues in
US public life, judicial citation practices hardly seem worthy of a rare
evening with two of its most distinguished members. Yet the auditorium
was packed, with hundreds more watching over a live video feed. |
|---|