Media Concentration and Democracy Why Ownership Matters
On June 2, 2003, the Republican-dominated Federal Communications Commission took a predictable step in its seemingly unstoppablemovementtowardmedia deregulation. Itannounced a major relaxation of its already relaxed rules restricting media concentration.1 The communications sector, the FCC found...
Đã lưu trong:
Tác giả chính: | |
---|---|
Định dạng: | Sách |
Ngôn ngữ: | English |
Được phát hành: |
Cambridge University Press
2013
|
Những chủ đề: | |
Truy cập trực tuyến: | http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35595 |
Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
---|
id |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-35595 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-355952014-01-19T23:44:14Z Media Concentration and Democracy Why Ownership Matters Baker, C. Edwin Concentration Democracy On June 2, 2003, the Republican-dominated Federal Communications Commission took a predictable step in its seemingly unstoppablemovementtowardmedia deregulation. Itannounced a major relaxation of its already relaxed rules restricting media concentration.1 The communications sector, the FCC found, is rife with competition. Ownership concentration presents little threat. More surprisingly, reducing restrictions on media mergers produced a storm of protest, from both the left and right, involving more vocalized public opposition than any FCC action ever. The FCC basically ignored nearly two million people of all political persuasions who registered their opposition.2 William Safire argued that “concentration of [media] power . . . should be anathema to conservatives.”3 Safire creditedmuch of the effectiveness of “the growing grass roots” movement “against giantism” in the media to “right-wing outfits,” although he also noted the role of progressives including Bill Moyers.4 Opposition was notwithout at least temporary effect.Congress partially reversed the FCC action.5 Then the Third Circuit Court of Appeals found most of the remainder unjustified, sending the relaxed rules back to the FCC for reconsideration.6 2013-09-19T03:20:07Z 2013-09-19T03:20:07Z 2006 Book 978-0-511-26036-0 http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35595 en application/pdf Cambridge University Press |
institution |
Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
collection |
Thư viện số |
language |
English |
topic |
Concentration Democracy |
spellingShingle |
Concentration Democracy Baker, C. Edwin Media Concentration and Democracy Why Ownership Matters |
description |
On June 2, 2003, the Republican-dominated Federal Communications
Commission took a predictable step in its seemingly unstoppablemovementtowardmedia
deregulation. Itannounced a major relaxation
of its already relaxed rules restricting media concentration.1 The
communications sector, the FCC found, is rife with competition. Ownership
concentration presents little threat. More surprisingly, reducing
restrictions on media mergers produced a storm of protest, from both
the left and right, involving more vocalized public opposition than any
FCC action ever. The FCC basically ignored nearly two million people of
all political persuasions who registered their opposition.2 William Safire
argued that “concentration of [media] power . . . should be anathema to
conservatives.”3 Safire creditedmuch of the effectiveness of “the growing
grass roots” movement “against giantism” in the media to “right-wing
outfits,” although he also noted the role of progressives including Bill
Moyers.4 Opposition was notwithout at least temporary effect.Congress
partially reversed the FCC action.5 Then the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals found most of the remainder unjustified, sending the relaxed
rules back to the FCC for reconsideration.6 |
format |
Book |
author |
Baker, C. Edwin |
author_facet |
Baker, C. Edwin |
author_sort |
Baker, C. Edwin |
title |
Media Concentration
and Democracy
Why Ownership Matters |
title_short |
Media Concentration
and Democracy
Why Ownership Matters |
title_full |
Media Concentration
and Democracy
Why Ownership Matters |
title_fullStr |
Media Concentration
and Democracy
Why Ownership Matters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Media Concentration
and Democracy
Why Ownership Matters |
title_sort |
media concentration
and democracy
why ownership matters |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35595 |
_version_ |
1757658618679787520 |