The Common Agricultural Policy and Organic Farming
This book has a general concern with the conditions for, and dynamics of, institutional and ideational changes and a specific concern with changes in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU). Starting with the specific concern, the CAP is often thought of as a political fie...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Được phát hành: |
CABI
2014
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/36537 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
|---|
| Tóm tắt: | This book has a general concern with the conditions for, and dynamics of,
institutional and ideational changes and a specific concern with changes in the
Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU). Starting with
the specific concern, the CAP is often thought of as a political field
characterised by a very high degree of stability in terms of polity, politics and
policy. This perception is evident in references to the CAP which has been
described variously as: being 'extremely path dependent' and governed by a
'club-like' Agriculture Council (Peterson and Bomberg 1999, p. 135; Swinbank
1989, p.304), as governed by an 'iron triangle' of farmers' organisations,
Commission officials and Ministers of Agriculture (Hix 1999, p.253), as having
found its 'policy equilibrium' (Peters 1996, p.63) or, in general, as 'a prime
example of multiple forms of institutional resistance to change' (Banchoff 2002,
p.6). The gist of the matter is that the CAP is often considered to be very much
set as to the types of agents participating in the formulation of the policy, the
political processes guiding the field and there also seems to exist clear
boundaries on which issues are to be included and excluded from consideration.
On the other hand, recent research into the development of the CAP has
increasingly pointed to changes in its institutional set up and to changes which
may be regarded as ideational |
|---|