Farm Incomes, Wealth and Agricultural Policy: Filling the CAP's Core Information Gap

Since the first edition of this book appeared in 1989 there have been substantial changes to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU) and in the ways in which it is implemented. Most notable of these was the adoption in 1992 of the `MacSharry' reforms that cut institut...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Đã lưu trong:
Chi tiết về thư mục
Tác giả chính: Hill, Berkeley
Định dạng: Sách
Ngôn ngữ:English
Được phát hành: CABI 2014
Truy cập trực tuyến:https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/37116
Các nhãn: Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
Thư viện lưu trữ: Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt
Miêu tả
Tóm tắt:Since the first edition of this book appeared in 1989 there have been substantial changes to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU) and in the ways in which it is implemented. Most notable of these was the adoption in 1992 of the `MacSharry' reforms that cut institutional support prices for some major agricultural commodities and compensated farmers by forms of direct payment. Both the cuts and the introduction of direct payments would have been assumed to be politically unacceptable only a few years previously. Reform was carried further in the direction of reduced market intervention and greater emphasis on direct payments by the Agenda 2000 package, agreed in 1999, which also confirmed rural development as a 'second pillar' of the CAP. The Mid-Term Review of 2003 transformed direct payments from 2005 onwards into the (relatively) decoupled Single Payment Scheme. This reorientation to a more explicit and transparent means of farm support has awakened interest in the distribution of benefit under the CAP and in the overall income situation and living conditions of those who receive direct payments. Questions are being raised about who are the intended target group for agricultural support spending; who constitutes the 'agricultural community' for which the CAP attempts to ensure a 'fair standard of living'; and how effective is public spending at reaching them?