Experimental Social Psychology - Volume 37
This article reviews controversies that have surrounded research on interpersonal accuracy for the last 50 years by providing and justifying a probabilistic conception of accuracy and by addressing the following issues: W hether accuracy can be distinguished from logical coherence; whether accur...
Đã lưu trong:
Tác giả chính: | |
---|---|
Định dạng: | Sách |
Ngôn ngữ: | English |
Được phát hành: |
Elsevier Academic Press
2015
|
Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/41042 |
Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
---|
id |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-41042 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-410422023-11-11T05:10:44Z Experimental Social Psychology - Volume 37 Zanna, Mark P. This article reviews controversies that have surrounded research on interpersonal accuracy for the last 50 years by providing and justifying a probabilistic conception of accuracy and by addressing the following issues: W hether accuracy can be distinguished from logical coherence; whether accuracy research provides insight into cognitive processes; why accuracy in perception of a behavior or trait must be distinguished from accuracy in explanations for that behavior or trait; how to distinguish self-fulfilling prophecy from accuracy; why distinguishing among several levels of analysis is crucial with respect to evaluating the accuracy of social stereotypes; whether accuracy research helps create or alleviate social problems; how accuracy can sometimes lead to discrimination; similarities and differences between establishing scientific construct validity and the accuracy of lay social beliefs; and the nature of some of the contributions to understanding social perception provided by componential and noncomponential approaches to the study of accuracy. 2015-04-15T03:22:50Z 2015-04-15T03:22:50Z 2005 Book 0-12-015237-1 https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/41042 en application/pdf Elsevier Academic Press |
institution |
Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
collection |
Thư viện số |
language |
English |
description |
This article reviews controversies that have surrounded research on
interpersonal accuracy for the last 50 years by providing and justifying a
probabilistic conception of accuracy and by addressing the following issues:
W hether accuracy can be distinguished from logical coherence; whether
accuracy research provides insight into cognitive processes; why accuracy
in perception of a behavior or trait must be distinguished from accuracy in
explanations for that behavior or trait; how to distinguish self-fulfilling prophecy
from accuracy; why distinguishing among several levels of analysis is
crucial with respect to evaluating the accuracy of social stereotypes; whether
accuracy research helps create or alleviate social problems; how accuracy
can sometimes lead to discrimination; similarities and differences between
establishing scientific construct validity and the accuracy of lay social beliefs;
and the nature of some of the contributions to understanding social perception
provided by componential and noncomponential approaches to the
study of accuracy. |
format |
Book |
author |
Zanna, Mark P. |
spellingShingle |
Zanna, Mark P. Experimental Social Psychology - Volume 37 |
author_facet |
Zanna, Mark P. |
author_sort |
Zanna, Mark P. |
title |
Experimental Social Psychology - Volume 37 |
title_short |
Experimental Social Psychology - Volume 37 |
title_full |
Experimental Social Psychology - Volume 37 |
title_fullStr |
Experimental Social Psychology - Volume 37 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Experimental Social Psychology - Volume 37 |
title_sort |
experimental social psychology - volume 37 |
publisher |
Elsevier Academic Press |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/41042 |
_version_ |
1782543651810836480 |