The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency
It is uncontroversial that corporations are legal agents that can be held legally responsible, but can corporations also be moral agents that are morally responsible? Part one of this book explicates the most prominent theories of corporate moral agency and provides a detailed debunking of why corpo...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Được phát hành: |
Springer
2015
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/58933 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
|---|
| id |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-58933 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-589332023-11-11T06:22:43Z The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency Rönnegard, David Business Ethics Economics Business Business ethics. Social responsibility of business It is uncontroversial that corporations are legal agents that can be held legally responsible, but can corporations also be moral agents that are morally responsible? Part one of this book explicates the most prominent theories of corporate moral agency and provides a detailed debunking of why corporate moral agency is a fallacy. This implies that talk of corporate moral responsibilities, beyond the mere metaphorical, is essentially meaningless. Part two takes the fallacy of corporate moral agency as its premise and spells out its implications. It shows how prominent normative theories within Corporate Social Responsibility, such as Stakeholder Theory and Social Contract Theory, rest on an implicit assumption of corporate moral agency. In this metaphysical respect such theories are untenable. In order to provide a more robust metaphysical foundation for corporations the book explicates the development of the corporate legal form in the US and UK, which displays how the corporation has come to have its current legal attributes. This historical evolution shows that the corporation is a legal fiction created by the state in order to serve both public and private goals. The normative implication for corporate accountability is that citizens of democratic states ought to primarily make calls for legal enactments in order to hold the corporate legal instruments accountable to their preferences. 2015-10-21T02:49:01Z 2015-10-21T02:49:01Z 2015 Book 978-94-017-9756-6 978-94-017-9755-9 https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/58933 en application/pdf Springer |
| institution |
Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
| collection |
Thư viện số |
| language |
English |
| topic |
Business Ethics Economics Business Business ethics. Social responsibility of business |
| spellingShingle |
Business Ethics Economics Business Business ethics. Social responsibility of business Rönnegard, David The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency |
| description |
It is uncontroversial that corporations are legal agents that can be held legally responsible, but can corporations also be moral agents that are morally responsible? Part one of this book explicates the most prominent theories of corporate moral agency and provides a detailed debunking of why corporate moral agency is a fallacy. This implies that talk of corporate moral responsibilities, beyond the mere metaphorical, is essentially meaningless. Part two takes the fallacy of corporate moral agency as its premise and spells out its implications. It shows how prominent normative theories within Corporate Social Responsibility, such as Stakeholder Theory and Social Contract Theory, rest on an implicit assumption of corporate moral agency. In this metaphysical respect such theories are untenable. In order to provide a more robust metaphysical foundation for corporations the book explicates the development of the corporate legal form in the US and UK, which displays how the corporation has come to have its current legal attributes. This historical evolution shows that the corporation is a legal fiction created by the state in order to serve both public and private goals. The normative implication for corporate accountability is that citizens of democratic states ought to primarily make calls for legal enactments in order to hold the corporate legal instruments accountable to their preferences. |
| format |
Book |
| author |
Rönnegard, David |
| author_facet |
Rönnegard, David |
| author_sort |
Rönnegard, David |
| title |
The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency |
| title_short |
The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency |
| title_full |
The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency |
| title_fullStr |
The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency |
| title_sort |
fallacy of corporate moral agency |
| publisher |
Springer |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| url |
https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/58933 |
| _version_ |
1819812044716638208 |