Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation
This book provides theoretical tools for evaluating the soundness of arguments in the context of legal argumentation. It deals with a number of general argument types and their particular use in legal argumentation. It provides detailed analyses of argument from authority, argument ad hominem, argum...
Đã lưu trong:
| Những tác giả chính: | , |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Được phát hành: |
Springer
2016
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/59588 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
|---|
| id |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-59588 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-595882023-11-11T06:44:54Z Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation Bustamante, Thomas Dahlman, Christian Semantics Methodology Law Forensic orations This book provides theoretical tools for evaluating the soundness of arguments in the context of legal argumentation. It deals with a number of general argument types and their particular use in legal argumentation. It provides detailed analyses of argument from authority, argument ad hominem, argument from ignorance, slippery slope argument and other general argument types. Each of these argument types can be used to construct arguments that are sound as well as arguments that are unsound. To evaluate an argument correctly one must be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task. 2016-01-11T08:17:46Z 2016-01-11T08:17:46Z 2015 Book 978-3-319-16148-8 978-3-319-16147-1 https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/59588 en application/pdf Springer |
| institution |
Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
| collection |
Thư viện số |
| language |
English |
| topic |
Semantics Methodology Law Forensic orations |
| spellingShingle |
Semantics Methodology Law Forensic orations Bustamante, Thomas Dahlman, Christian Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation |
| description |
This book provides theoretical tools for evaluating the soundness of arguments in the context of legal argumentation. It deals with a number of general argument types and their particular use in legal argumentation. It provides detailed analyses of argument from authority, argument ad hominem, argument from ignorance, slippery slope argument and other general argument types. Each of these argument types can be used to construct arguments that are sound as well as arguments that are unsound. To evaluate an argument correctly one must be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task. |
| format |
Book |
| author |
Bustamante, Thomas Dahlman, Christian |
| author_facet |
Bustamante, Thomas Dahlman, Christian |
| author_sort |
Bustamante, Thomas |
| title |
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation |
| title_short |
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation |
| title_full |
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation |
| title_fullStr |
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation |
| title_sort |
argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation |
| publisher |
Springer |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/59588 |
| _version_ |
1782543613526278144 |