Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research, 1st edition
Qualitative researchers have traditionally been cautious about claiming that their work was scientific. The "right-on" schools have exaggerated this caution into an outright rejection of science as a model for their work. Science is, for them, outmoded; "an archaic form of consciousne...
Đã lưu trong:
Tác giả chính: | |
---|---|
Định dạng: | Sách |
Ngôn ngữ: | English |
Được phát hành: |
Routledge
2020
|
Những chủ đề: | |
Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/93694 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127873 |
Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
---|
id |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-93694 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-936942023-11-11T07:09:09Z Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research, 1st edition Murphy, Elizabeth Social Sciences Qualitative researchers have traditionally been cautious about claiming that their work was scientific. The "right-on" schools have exaggerated this caution into an outright rejection of science as a model for their work. Science is, for them, outmoded; "an archaic form of consciousness surviving for a while yet in a degraded form" (Tyler 1986:200). Scientists' assertions that they are in pursuit of truth simply camouflage their own lust for power. There is no essential difference between truth and propaganda.The authors acknowledge that the boundary between science and propaganda has often been breached and some distrust of scientific claims may be healthy. They also question the claim that science creates disinterested and objective knowledge of an observer-independent world without concluding that science is impossible. The skeptics' reservations about qualitative research are based on the deep-rooted assumption among natural scientists, and some social scientists, that there is a world "out there," prior to, and independent of, their observations. This world can be known objectively in the sense that all observers will, if identically placed, see it in exactly the same way. If a suitable language were available, they would also all produce identical descriptions. From these observations they can work out the laws governing the world's operations. The authors try to resolve these contrary claims by asserting that science is a procedural commitment. It consists of openness to refutation, a conscientious and systematic search for contradictory evidence, and a readiness to subject one's preconceptions to critical examination. The devotion to truth as a regulative ideal is an essential difference between science and propaganda. This work is a unique and innovative defense of scientific method. 2020-06-25T02:23:37Z 2020-06-25T02:23:37Z 2017 Book 9781315127873 https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/93694 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127873 en application/pdf Routledge New York |
institution |
Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
collection |
Thư viện số |
language |
English |
topic |
Social Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Social Sciences Murphy, Elizabeth Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research, 1st edition |
description |
Qualitative researchers have traditionally been cautious about claiming that their work was scientific. The "right-on" schools have exaggerated this caution into an outright rejection of science as a model for their work. Science is, for them, outmoded; "an archaic form of consciousness surviving for a while yet in a degraded form" (Tyler 1986:200). Scientists' assertions that they are in pursuit of truth simply camouflage their own lust for power. There is no essential difference between truth and propaganda.The authors acknowledge that the boundary between science and propaganda has often been breached and some distrust of scientific claims may be healthy. They also question the claim that science creates disinterested and objective knowledge of an observer-independent world without concluding that science is impossible. The skeptics' reservations about qualitative research are based on the deep-rooted assumption among natural scientists, and some social scientists, that there is a world "out there," prior to, and independent of, their observations. This world can be known objectively in the sense that all observers will, if identically placed, see it in exactly the same way. If a suitable language were available, they would also all produce identical descriptions. From these observations they can work out the laws governing the world's operations. The authors try to resolve these contrary claims by asserting that science is a procedural commitment. It consists of openness to refutation, a conscientious and systematic search for contradictory evidence, and a readiness to subject one's preconceptions to critical examination. The devotion to truth as a regulative ideal is an essential difference between science and propaganda. This work is a unique and innovative defense of scientific method. |
format |
Book |
author |
Murphy, Elizabeth |
author_facet |
Murphy, Elizabeth |
author_sort |
Murphy, Elizabeth |
title |
Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research, 1st edition |
title_short |
Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research, 1st edition |
title_full |
Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research, 1st edition |
title_fullStr |
Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research, 1st edition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research, 1st edition |
title_sort |
qualitative methods and health policy research, 1st edition |
publisher |
Routledge |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/93694 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127873 |
_version_ |
1819796687961456640 |