Post-tenure faculty review and renewal II : reporting results and shaping policy
A joint publication from the American Association for Higher Education’s New Pathways Project and Anker Publishing Company, this book is the second in a series on review, renewal, and vitality of tenured faculty. Discussed here is how to report the results of post-tenure review responsibly, accurate...
Đã lưu trong:
| Định dạng: | Sách |
|---|---|
| Ngôn ngữ: | Undetermined |
| Được phát hành: |
Bolton, Mass.
Anker Pub. Co.
2004
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Cần Thơ |
|---|
| LEADER | 02033nam a2200229Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CTU_166035 | ||
| 008 | 210402s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
| 020 | |c 30.77 | ||
| 082 | |a 378.1214 | ||
| 082 | |b P857 | ||
| 245 | 0 | |a Post-tenure faculty review and renewal II : | |
| 245 | 0 | |b reporting results and shaping policy | |
| 245 | 0 | |c Christine M. Licata, Betsy E. Brown, editors. | |
| 260 | |a Bolton, Mass. | ||
| 260 | |b Anker Pub. Co. | ||
| 260 | |c 2004 | ||
| 520 | |a A joint publication from the American Association for Higher Education’s New Pathways Project and Anker Publishing Company, this book is the second in a series on review, renewal, and vitality of tenured faculty. Discussed here is how to report the results of post-tenure review responsibly, accurately, and effectively. Because post-tenure review policy in higher education is a relatively young phenomenon, few examples are available of effective and practical ways for campuses and systems to assess their policies, report on results, and reflect on their meaning. This volume fills provides guidelines for placing data in perspective and creating knowledge that leads to wise policymaking and institutional learning. Providing examples of how this can be accomplished, the authors also supply extensive appendices that contain examples of data collection and forms, comprehensive reports, and implementation studies. This is an invaluable guide to those in the field who are grappling with how to track, report, and use information on the results of tenured faculty review in a realistic, reflective, and practical way. | ||
| 650 | |a College teachers,College teachers,Universities and colleges,Giáo viên đại học,Giáo viên đại học,Trường Cao đẳng và Đại học | ||
| 650 | |x Rating of,Tenure,Faculty,Rating of,Đánh giá,Nhiệm kỳ,Khoa,Đánh giá | ||
| 650 | |z United States,United States,United States,Hoa Kỳ,Hoa Kỳ,Hoa Kỳ | ||
| 904 | |i Năm | ||
| 980 | |a Trung tâm Học liệu Trường Đại học Cần Thơ | ||