Software Process Quality- Management and Control
Software presents both an opportunity and a threat. Software runs our lives. The list of applications in which software is a critical component is endless: elevators, airlines, telecommunications, medical devices, education, and countless others. Data from the Software Engineering Institute indicate...
Đã lưu trong:
| Những tác giả chính: | , |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Được phát hành: |
CRC Press
2009
|
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/1358 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
|---|
| id |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-1358 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-13582009-11-27T09:29:14Z Software Process Quality- Management and Control S. Kenett, Ron R. Baker, Emanuel Software presents both an opportunity and a threat. Software runs our lives. The list of applications in which software is a critical component is endless: elevators, airlines, telecommunications, medical devices, education, and countless others. Data from the Software Engineering Institute indicates that approximately 60% of software development organizations that have had formal assessments designed to determine how their software is developed are at the lowest level of capability. These assessments are based on the Capability Maturity Model—a framework for achieving process improvement. This lowest level is characterized as ad hoc and chaotic, having virtually nothing in the way of organized project management or software engineering practices. Over 600 organizations worldwide have gone through such assessments. These are organizations that have either embarked on improvement efforts of their software development process or made a commitment to do so. If we add in all the organizations that have not had assessments performed, or have no plans to implement process improvement, we estimate that the number of organizations at the lowest level is probably well in excess of 80%. Series Introduction by Mark E. Coticchia Foreword by Peter A. Freeman Preface 1. A Framework for Software Quality 2. Basics of Quality Management and Continuous ProcessImprovement 3. ISO 9000, SEI Capability Maturity Model (CMM), and Continuous Software Process Improvement 4. Software Measurements Programs: Strategies and Implementation Issues 5. Quality of Software Products and Documents 6. Software Reliability Control 7. Software Review and Inspection Processes 8. Software Development Management Dashboards 2009-11-27T09:29:14Z 2009-11-27T09:29:14Z 1999 Book https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/1358 en application/octet-stream CRC Press |
| institution |
Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
| collection |
Thư viện số |
| language |
English |
| description |
Software presents both an opportunity and a threat. Software runs our lives. The list of applications in which software is a critical component is endless: elevators, airlines, telecommunications, medical devices, education, and countless others. Data from the Software Engineering Institute indicates that approximately 60% of software development organizations that have had formal assessments designed to determine how their software is developed are at the lowest level of capability. These assessments are based on the Capability Maturity Model—a framework for achieving process improvement. This lowest level is characterized as ad hoc and chaotic, having virtually nothing in the way of organized project management or software engineering practices. Over 600 organizations worldwide have gone through such assessments. These are organizations that have either embarked on improvement efforts of their software development process or made a commitment to do so. If we add in all the organizations that have not had assessments performed, or have no plans to implement process improvement, we estimate that the number of organizations at the lowest level is probably well in excess of 80%. |
| format |
Book |
| author |
S. Kenett, Ron R. Baker, Emanuel |
| spellingShingle |
S. Kenett, Ron R. Baker, Emanuel Software Process Quality- Management and Control |
| author_facet |
S. Kenett, Ron R. Baker, Emanuel |
| author_sort |
S. Kenett, Ron |
| title |
Software Process Quality- Management and Control |
| title_short |
Software Process Quality- Management and Control |
| title_full |
Software Process Quality- Management and Control |
| title_fullStr |
Software Process Quality- Management and Control |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Software Process Quality- Management and Control |
| title_sort |
software process quality- management and control |
| publisher |
CRC Press |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| url |
https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/1358 |
| _version_ |
1819831786584145920 |