Repossessing the romantic past
How should we repossess the past? Applied to academic writing now about Romantic-period writing, this is a disingenuous question. It presupposes a scholarly field in which antagonistic critical positions are already drawn up in unignorable fashion. New work on British Romanticism is often charac...
Đã lưu trong:
Tác giả chính: | |
---|---|
Định dạng: | Sách |
Ngôn ngữ: | English |
Được phát hành: |
cambridge university press
2013
|
Những chủ đề: | |
Truy cập trực tuyến: | http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35413 |
Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
---|
id |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-35413 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-354132014-01-19T23:54:04Z Repossessing the romantic past Glen, Heather Repossessing Romantic How should we repossess the past? Applied to academic writing now about Romantic-period writing, this is a disingenuous question. It presupposes a scholarly field in which antagonistic critical positions are already drawn up in unignorable fashion. New work on British Romanticism is often characterized as much by its conscious difference from preceding positions as it is by its take on or choice of material. As a result, writing neglected or marginalized in one account will be restored to prominence in another. In fact, for some, such difference has become the point of the critical exercise itself. The past as we construct it becomes nothing more than a history of the present. 2013-09-06T01:55:26Z 2013-09-06T01:55:26Z 2006 Book 978-0-511-24947-1 http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35413 en application/pdf cambridge university press |
institution |
Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
collection |
Thư viện số |
language |
English |
topic |
Repossessing Romantic |
spellingShingle |
Repossessing Romantic Glen, Heather Repossessing the romantic past |
description |
How should we repossess the past? Applied to academic writing now about
Romantic-period writing, this is a disingenuous question. It presupposes
a scholarly field in which antagonistic critical positions are already drawn
up in unignorable fashion. New work on British Romanticism is often
characterized as much by its conscious difference from preceding positions
as it is by its take on or choice of material. As a result, writing neglected or
marginalized in one account will be restored to prominence in another. In
fact, for some, such difference has become the point of the critical exercise
itself. The past as we construct it becomes nothing more than a history of
the present. |
format |
Book |
author |
Glen, Heather |
author_facet |
Glen, Heather |
author_sort |
Glen, Heather |
title |
Repossessing the romantic past |
title_short |
Repossessing the romantic past |
title_full |
Repossessing the romantic past |
title_fullStr |
Repossessing the romantic past |
title_full_unstemmed |
Repossessing the romantic past |
title_sort |
repossessing the romantic past |
publisher |
cambridge university press |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35413 |
_version_ |
1757654338978709504 |