Media Argumentation Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric
What initially led me to start work on this project was the observation that the examples of fallacies and questionable argument tactics studied in textbooks of informal logic often featured examples of advertisements and political arguments of the kind that have to do with elections or with pub...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Được phát hành: |
Cambridge University Press
2013
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35768 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
|---|
| Tóm tắt: | What initially led me to start work on this project was the observation
that the examples of fallacies and questionable argument tactics studied
in textbooks of informal logic often featured examples of advertisements
and political arguments of the kind that have to do with elections or
with public policies. Many of them are media arguments from sources
such as political speeches, commercial ads, or Internet blogs. Such arguments
are especially interesting when it is evident that they were used –
for example, in ads – as rhetorically effective techniques to persuade a
mass audience. Formerly (and often still), such arguments tended to be
classified in logic as fallacious. |
|---|