Media Argumentation Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric
What initially led me to start work on this project was the observation that the examples of fallacies and questionable argument tactics studied in textbooks of informal logic often featured examples of advertisements and political arguments of the kind that have to do with elections or with pub...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Sách |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Được phát hành: |
Cambridge University Press
2013
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35768 |
| Các nhãn: |
Thêm thẻ
Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!
|
| Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
|---|
| id |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-35768 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-357682014-01-19T23:32:46Z Media Argumentation Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric Walton, Douglas Dialectic Rhetoric What initially led me to start work on this project was the observation that the examples of fallacies and questionable argument tactics studied in textbooks of informal logic often featured examples of advertisements and political arguments of the kind that have to do with elections or with public policies. Many of them are media arguments from sources such as political speeches, commercial ads, or Internet blogs. Such arguments are especially interesting when it is evident that they were used – for example, in ads – as rhetorically effective techniques to persuade a mass audience. Formerly (and often still), such arguments tended to be classified in logic as fallacious. 2013-10-11T08:27:08Z 2013-10-11T08:27:08Z 2007 Book 978-0-511-35469-4 http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35768 en application/pdf Cambridge University Press |
| institution |
Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
| collection |
Thư viện số |
| language |
English |
| topic |
Dialectic Rhetoric |
| spellingShingle |
Dialectic Rhetoric Walton, Douglas Media Argumentation Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric |
| description |
What initially led me to start work on this project was the observation
that the examples of fallacies and questionable argument tactics studied
in textbooks of informal logic often featured examples of advertisements
and political arguments of the kind that have to do with elections or
with public policies. Many of them are media arguments from sources
such as political speeches, commercial ads, or Internet blogs. Such arguments
are especially interesting when it is evident that they were used –
for example, in ads – as rhetorically effective techniques to persuade a
mass audience. Formerly (and often still), such arguments tended to be
classified in logic as fallacious. |
| format |
Book |
| author |
Walton, Douglas |
| author_facet |
Walton, Douglas |
| author_sort |
Walton, Douglas |
| title |
Media Argumentation
Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric |
| title_short |
Media Argumentation
Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric |
| title_full |
Media Argumentation
Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric |
| title_fullStr |
Media Argumentation
Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Media Argumentation
Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric |
| title_sort |
media argumentation
dialectic, persuasion, and rhetoric |
| publisher |
Cambridge University Press |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| url |
http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35768 |
| _version_ |
1757661156392042496 |