A CROSS- CULTURAL STUDY OF CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ENGLISH CLASSES IN VIETNAM BY ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS AND VIETNAMESE TEACHERS OF ENGLISH

Based on the theoretical background of pragmatics and cross-cultural pragmatics, this study investigates similarities and differences in criticizing university students in English classes by English Native Speakers Teachers (ENSTs) and Vietnamese Teachers of English (VTsE) in terms of politene...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Trịnh Thị Nhung
Outros Autores:	Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lưu Quý Khương
Formato:	Luận văn
Idioma:	English
Publicado em:	Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Đà Nẵng 2025
Acesso em linha:	https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1836
Tags:	Adicionar Tag Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!

Thư viện lưu trữ:	Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ - Đại học Đà Nẵng

id	oai:data.ufl.udn.vn:UFL-1836
record_format	dspace
institution	Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ - Đại học Đà Nẵng
collection	DSpace
language	English
description	Based on the theoretical background of pragmatics and cross-cultural pragmatics, this study investigates similarities and differences in criticizing university students in English classes by English Native Speakers Teachers (ENSTs) and Vietnamese Teachers of English (VTsE) in terms of politeness strategy. The data of the study is collected via two kinds of questionnaire. The first is Metapragmatic questionnaire (MPQ) which tests the validity and the reliability of the manner of complimenting in 12 typical situations. The second is Discourse Completion Task questionnaire (DCT) which collects linguistic input. Besides, some parameters of informants such as age, gender, nationality, teaching experience are also taken into consideration so that the two aspects of the politeness dimension above are thoroughly investigated. The findings of the study are cross- cultural compared and contrasted so as to specify major similarities and differences in the ways ENSTs and VTsE criticize university students. The author hopes that the study, to a certain extent, helps cross-cultural interactants communicate effectively and avoid cultural shock or communication breakdown.
author2	Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lưu Quý Khương
author_facet	Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lưu Quý Khương Trịnh Thị Nhung
format	Thesis
author	Trịnh Thị Nhung
spellingShingle	Trịnh Thị Nhung A CROSS- CULTURAL STUDY OF CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ENGLISH CLASSES IN VIETNAM BY ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS AND VIETNAMESE TEACHERS OF ENGLISH
author_sort	Trịnh Thị Nhung
title	A CROSS- CULTURAL STUDY OF CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ENGLISH CLASSES IN VIETNAM BY ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS AND VIETNAMESE TEACHERS OF ENGLISH
title_short	A CROSS- CULTURAL STUDY OF CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ENGLISH CLASSES IN VIETNAM BY ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS AND VIETNAMESE TEACHERS OF ENGLISH
title_full	A CROSS- CULTURAL STUDY OF CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ENGLISH CLASSES IN VIETNAM BY ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS AND VIETNAMESE TEACHERS OF ENGLISH
title_fullStr	A CROSS- CULTURAL STUDY OF CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ENGLISH CLASSES IN VIETNAM BY ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS AND VIETNAMESE TEACHERS OF ENGLISH
title_full_unstemmed	A CROSS- CULTURAL STUDY OF CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ENGLISH CLASSES IN VIETNAM BY ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS AND VIETNAMESE TEACHERS OF ENGLISH
title_sort	cross- cultural study of criticizing university students in english classes in vietnam by english native speaker teachers and vietnamese teachers of english
publisher	Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Đà Nẵng
publishDate	2025
url	https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1836
_version_	1848488566099804160
spelling	oai:data.ufl.udn.vn:UFL-18362025-03-19T04:40:02Z A CROSS- CULTURAL STUDY OF CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ENGLISH CLASSES IN VIETNAM BY ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS AND VIETNAMESE TEACHERS OF ENGLISH LV ThS 418 Trịnh Thị Nhung Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lưu Quý Khương Based on the theoretical background of pragmatics and cross-cultural pragmatics, this study investigates similarities and differences in criticizing university students in English classes by English Native Speakers Teachers (ENSTs) and Vietnamese Teachers of English (VTsE) in terms of politeness strategy. The data of the study is collected via two kinds of questionnaire. The first is Metapragmatic questionnaire (MPQ) which tests the validity and the reliability of the manner of complimenting in 12 typical situations. The second is Discourse Completion Task questionnaire (DCT) which collects linguistic input. Besides, some parameters of informants such as age, gender, nationality, teaching experience are also taken into consideration so that the two aspects of the politeness dimension above are thoroughly investigated. The findings of the study are cross- cultural compared and contrasted so as to specify major similarities and differences in the ways ENSTs and VTsE criticize university students. The author hopes that the study, to a certain extent, helps cross-cultural interactants communicate effectively and avoid cultural shock or communication breakdown. TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP ................................................................... i ABSTRACT......................................................................................................ii TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................... v LIST OF TABLE ............................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIRGURE ........................................................................................ vii CHATER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1. RATIONALE............................................................................................. 1 1.2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ....................................................................... 3 1.2.1. AIMS............................................................................................. 3 1.2.2. OBJECTIVES............................................................................... 4 1.3. RESEARCH QUESTIONS........................................................................ 4 1.4. SCOPE OF THE STUDY.......................................................................... 4 1.5. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY........................................................... 5 1.6. ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY........................................................ 5 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. PREVIOUS RESEARCHES RELATED TO THE TOPIC ...................... 7 2.2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND......................................................... 10 2.2.1. CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION............................. 10 2.2.2. PRAGMATICS AND CROSS-CULTURAL PRAGMATICS . 12 2.2.3. THEORY OF POLITENESS ..................................................... 13 2.2.4. POLITENESS ACROSS CULTURES ...................................... 19 2.2.5. DIRECTNESS AND INDIRECTNESS..................................... 19 2.2.6. THEORY OF SPEECH ACTS................................................... 21 iv CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 3.1. RESEARCH METHODS ........................................................................ 30 3.2. DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS ............................................... 30 3.3. SAMPLING ............................................................................................. 31 3.4. PROCEDURE OF DATA COLLECTION ............................................. 32 3.5. PROCEDURE OF DATA ANALYSIS................................................... 35 CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 4.1. REALIZATION OF STRATEGIES IN CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS .................................................................................................... 36 4.1.1. DIRECT CRITICISMS .............................................................. 36 4.1.2. INDIRECT CRITICISMS .......................................................... 43 4.2. USE OF DIRECT STRATEGIES OR INDIRECT STRATEGIES AS SEEN FROM COMMUNICATING PARTNERS......................................... 50 4.2.1. CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS BY VTSE............ 50 4.2.2. CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS BY ENSTS.......... 59 4.3. CROSS-CULTURAL SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES.............. 65 4.3.1. DIFFERENCES.......................................................................... 66 4.3.2. SIMILARITIES .......................................................................... 69 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION 5.1. A SUMMARY OF THE STUDY............................................................ 71 5.2. PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY........................... 72 5.3. LIMITATION .......................................................................................... 72 5.4. SUGGESTION FOR THE STUDY......................................................... 73 REFERENCES.............................................................................................. 74 QUYẾT ĐỊNH GIAO ĐỀ TÀI (bản sao 2025-03-19T04:39:58Z 2025-03-19T04:39:58Z 2013 Thesis https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1836 en application/pdf application/pdf Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Đà Nẵng

A CROSS- CULTURAL STUDY OF CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ENGLISH CLASSES IN VIETNAM BY ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS AND VIETNAMESE TEACHERS OF ENGLISH

Registos relacionados