Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights ACT

A number of commentators have pointed out that the inception of Bills of Rights tends to have the effect, as in Canada, of requiring courts to grapple with justifications for rights and freedoms, taking a more philosophical approach to legal reasoning as they attempt to resolve conflicts between...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Đã lưu trong:

Chi tiết về thư mục
Những tác giả chính:	Fenwick, Helen, Masterman, Roger, Gavin, Phillipson
Định dạng:	Sách
Ngôn ngữ:	English
Được phát hành:	Cambridge University Press 2013
Những chủ đề:	Judicial Human
Truy cập trực tuyến:	http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35759
Các nhãn:	Thêm thẻ Không có thẻ, Là người đầu tiên thẻ bản ghi này!

Thư viện lưu trữ:	Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt

id	oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-35759
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:scholar.dlu.edu.vn:DLU123456789-357592014-01-19T23:33:17Z Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights ACT Fenwick, Helen Masterman, Roger Gavin, Phillipson Judicial Human A number of commentators have pointed out that the inception of Bills of Rights tends to have the effect, as in Canada, of requiring courts to grapple with justifications for rights and freedoms, taking a more philosophical approach to legal reasoning as they attempt to resolve conflicts between individual rights and competing societal and individual interests.1 When countries adopt a document setting out a list of human rights with special constitutional status (‘a Bill of Rights’), the effect on judicial reasoning tends to be dramatic – as it was in Canada when it adopted the Charter of Rights. In 2000, the Human Rights Act came into force – affording the European Convention on Human Rights further effect in domestic law – and, while it does not have the entrenched status of other Bills of Rights, there is agreement that it does have what ‘constitutional’ status UK law allows.2 2013-10-10T02:46:08Z 2013-10-10T02:46:08Z 2007 Book 978-0-511-34133-5 http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35759 en application/pdf Cambridge University Press
institution	Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt
collection	Thư viện số
language	English
topic	Judicial Human
spellingShingle	Judicial Human Fenwick, Helen Masterman, Roger Gavin, Phillipson Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights ACT
description	A number of commentators have pointed out that the inception of Bills of Rights tends to have the effect, as in Canada, of requiring courts to grapple with justifications for rights and freedoms, taking a more philosophical approach to legal reasoning as they attempt to resolve conflicts between individual rights and competing societal and individual interests.1 When countries adopt a document setting out a list of human rights with special constitutional status (‘a Bill of Rights’), the effect on judicial reasoning tends to be dramatic – as it was in Canada when it adopted the Charter of Rights. In 2000, the Human Rights Act came into force – affording the European Convention on Human Rights further effect in domestic law – and, while it does not have the entrenched status of other Bills of Rights, there is agreement that it does have what ‘constitutional’ status UK law allows.2
format	Book
author	Fenwick, Helen Masterman, Roger Gavin, Phillipson
author_facet	Fenwick, Helen Masterman, Roger Gavin, Phillipson
author_sort	Fenwick, Helen
title	Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights ACT
title_short	Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights ACT
title_full	Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights ACT
title_fullStr	Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights ACT
title_full_unstemmed	Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights ACT
title_sort	judicial reasoning under the uk human rights act
publisher	Cambridge University Press
publishDate	2013
url	http://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35759
_version_	1757650398369284096

Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights ACT

Những quyển sách tương tự