Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights ACT
A number of commentators have pointed out that the inception of Bills of Rights tends to have the effect, as in Canada, of requiring courts to grapple with justifications for rights and freedoms, taking a more philosophical approach to legal reasoning as they attempt to resolve conflicts between...
Kaydedildi:
Asıl Yazarlar: | Fenwick, Helen, Masterman, Roger, Gavin, Phillipson |
---|---|
Materyal Türü: | Kitap |
Dil: | English |
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Cambridge University Press
2013
|
Konular: | |
Online Erişim: | https://scholar.dlu.edu.vn/thuvienso/handle/DLU123456789/35759 |
Etiketler: |
Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
|
Thư viện lưu trữ: | Thư viện Trường Đại học Đà Lạt |
---|
Benzer Materyaller
-
The judicial process: Realism, pragmatism, practical reasoning, and principles
Yazar:: Thomas, E W
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2013) -
Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions
Yazar:: Steiner, Eva
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2016) -
Judicial review in new democracies: Constitutional courts in Asian cases
Yazar:: Ginsburg, Tom
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2013) -
Judicial Activism:
An Interdisciplinary Approach to the American and European Experiences
Yazar:: Pereira Coutinho, Luís, ve diğerleri
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2016) -
The cultural politics of human rights: Comparing the US and UK
Yazar:: Nash, Kate
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2013)